Quantcast
Channel: Crossdreamer Sidebars
Viewing all 24 articles
Browse latest View live

APPENDIX on the masculinity versus femininity scale of Hofstede.

$
0
0
This presentation of Hofstede's analysis of masculinity and femininity in cultures accompanies the Crossdreamer blog post on Gender Identity in Barbie Land

Geert Hostede: Table combining data from the individualism/
collectivism  index and the masculin/feminine value index.
Click in image to enlarge!
Note that the IBM study's concept of masculinity versus femininity only can be used as a proxy for whatever it is these terms mean in the common language. In Hofstede's study masculinity and femininity is based on men's and women's attitudes to certain work related preferences.

Hofstede says that the decisive reason for labeling one of the work goals dimensions of the survey masculinity versus femininity was that "this dimension is the only one on which the men and the women among the IBM employees scored consistently differently".

The only exception to this rule was Sweden and Norway. Neither power distance, individualism or uncertainty avoidance showed a systematic difference in answers between men and women. (p. 139)

The masculinity versus femininity dimensions was most strongly associated with the following work goal items:

"For the masculine pole
1. Earnings: have an opportunity for high earnings
2. Recognition: get the recognition you deserve when you do a good job
3. Advancement: have an opportunity for advancement to higher-level jobs
4. Challenge: have challenging work to do -- work form which you can get a personal sense of accomplishment

For the feminine pole:

5. Manager: have a good working relationship with your direct superior
6. Cooperation: work with people who cooperate well with one another
7. Living area: live in an area desirable to you and your family
8. Employment security: have the security that you will be able to work for your company as long as you want.


Autogynephilia: The Dark Side (original version)

$
0
0
In 2009, when my Crossdreamer blog was young, I wrote a blog post called Autogynephilia, the Dark Side. The whole point of the post was to demask the autogynephilia theory of Dr. Ray Blanchard. Unfortunately, at the time, I was still not completely up to date with the nuances of transgender terminology, and I used phrases that definitely could be misinterpreted. Enemies of the crossdreamer concept have made use of this misstep enthusiastically. I have therefore been forced to make an exception from my normal policy of leaving blog posts as they are out of respect for those commenting.

Instead I am posting the original post of August 9 2009 here for reference. Any changes made to the original text between that date and February 24 2014 are clearly marked.

Autogynephilia: The Dark Side


In my previous blog post I presented the concept of autogynephilia and what it means to me.

In this blog post I will try to explain why it has become so controversial in trangender circles, and what I personally find most disturbing about it.



Why the term is so controversial

The controversial part is the idea that autogynephiliacs are driven by sexual desire.

To quote Lawrence again:

"In 1989, psychologist Ray Blanchard made the controversial proposal that the “atypical” male-to-female transsexuals described above, and the heterosexual cross-dressers with whom they seemed to have so much in common, both experienced a powerful sexual attraction to the idea of being or becoming women. This unusual sexual interest, or paraphilia, he theorized, was the driving force behind their behavior. Blanchard called this paraphilia autogynephilia, meaning 'love of oneself as a woman' (1989a).

"He formally defined autogynephilia as 'a male’s propensity to be sexually aroused by the thought of himself as a female' (1989b). According to Blanchard’s formulation, heterosexual cross-dressers were men who were sexually attracted to women and who had a paraphilic sexual interest that made them want to episodically impersonate the objects of their attraction. Autogynephilic transsexuals, he theorized, were men who were also sexually attracted to women, but whose paraphilic sexual interest made them want to go farther and permanently change their bodies to become the objects of their attraction, or the best possible facsimiles thereof."

This theory caused an uproar in transgender circles. Lawrence find this, for some reason, surprising. I do not.

The sexless transgendered
Now, if you read the debate, it might seem that the main issue is that Blanchard argued that the driving force for these transgendered men is sexual desire.

It is argued that many transgender persons found that this undermined their legitimacy vis-a-vis the doctors, and that they would not get surgery if they admitted they found feminization to be sexually arousing.

Because of this, the story goes, many transgender activists opposed Blanchard because it would damage the cause of transsexuals. Some of them argued strongly that they were not driven by sexual desire; others admitted that you needed to keep the erotic component hidden in order to get the surgery.

I find it hard to understand transgenderism without the sex. To me the sexual drive and gender identification is strongly connected, and the fact that transgendered men get sexually aroused by imagining themselves with a female body is pretty obvious.

I mean, look at "genuine girls" biological women. Many of them spend hours shopping for clothes, dressing up, putting on make-up, looking at themselves in the mirror. Of course there is a sexual component in this behavior. Many of them like their own bodies and femininity. They are at peace with themselves. That is a good thing! Moreover, research indicate that most genuine XX girls (natal women) are autogynephiliacs!

Moreover, male autogynephiliacs are in a life situation where it is hard for them to have a normal sex life. They love women, but find themselves inadquate as men. This may lead to a lot of sexual frustration -- celibacy even. No wonder their sexaul libido is channeled into fantasies of this kind.

So why the idea that M2F transgendered fantasizing about being women get aroused should be offensive, I don't know. It is a sad fact, though, that the medical establishment used to frown upon these things, and that M2F transgendered kept quiet about it. They often pretended to be sexless women trapped in a sexless man's body.

The real reason why Blanchard's and Lawrence's theory is problematic

The real reason I find Blanchard and Lawrence's theory so problematic is another one.

What this theory says is that these men are suffering from "erotic target location errors”. They are supposed to feel desire for the women out there. Instead they internalize the object of desire. They want to become that woman.

The narrative here is that the autogynephiliac is really a normal heterosexual man that would -- under normal circumstances -- go out and find a woman to desire. But, because of some error (being that biochemical or psychological) he has "malfunctioned".

His sexual desire (or, as Lawrence expands: his erotic-romantic orientation, which also includes other forms of pair-bonding) is channeled inwards instead of outwards.

If we now for a moment drop the scientific jargon, what I read is the following message:

This man is not only a "freak" in the eyes of others. He is truly a dysfunctional person. Scientific words like dysphoria and paraphilia cannot hide this message. I am sure Blanchard and Lawrence do not feel this way, but unless you think this kind of self-obsession is a good thing the verdict is devastating.

Lawrence's solution to this problem is (in some places, but not in others) to define autogynephilia as a sexual orientation in itself (on par with heterosexuality I suppose).

She defends the rights of autogynephiliacs to have sexual reassignment surgery on this basis. She doesn't say as much, but I guess the underlying message is that since autogynephilia is a natural phenomenon the autogynephiliacs should be allowed to live out their obsession.

The problem is, however, that as the phenomenon is described by Blanchard and Lawrence the autogynephiliac does come out as a kind of narcissist, a self-lover, a person who wants to become the object he loves, and therefore wants to make love to himself as a woman. That does not sound particularly good to me.

The potential male partners in this narrative become mere props: large human dildos the autogynephiliacs can use to fulfill their fantasies.

Because of this is seems like Lawrence and Blanchard think that autogynephiliacs will be unable to enter into a normal love/sex relationship with another human being.

The controversy summarized

Here is a crystal clear summary of the Blanchard narrative made by Michael Bailey:

"Currently the predominant cultural understanding of male-to-female transsexualism is that all male-to-female (MtF) transsexuals are, essentially, women trapped in men's bodies. This understanding has little scientific basis, however, and is inconsistent with clinical observations. Ray Blanchard has shown that there are two distinct subtypes of MtF transsexuals. Members of one subtype, homosexual transsexuals, are best understood as a type of homosexual male. The other subtype, autogynephilic transsexuals, are motivated by the erotic desire to become women. The persistence of the predominant cultural understanding, while explicable, is damaging to science and to many transsexuals."

What this means is that M2F trangender men having undergone the transformations are not women at all. They are at best a category in themselves, or they remain men in spite of their appearances. There is no "feminine essence" that makes them women; they are an evolutionary blind alley.

The other transgender narrative

Now, compare this narrative to the one that is gaining acceptance in modern societies: A male to female transsexual is really a woman, truly a woman, a normal woman living "inside" her male body.

There is no denying that something has gone wrong in the lives of male to female transsexuals (also called "transwomen"). She is after all trapped in a man's body, even if her personality may be sound. But she is not a freak. What's needed is a sex reassignment therapy that gives her the body she should have had all along.

Note that in this narrative it does not matter whether she is heterosexual, homosexual or bisexual. In the US and Europe at least, these sexualities are accepted as normal for both women and men.

So an autogynephiliac accepting this narrative can think of herself as a healthy woman that has become herself in body and soul.

An autogynephiliac accepting Blanchard's narrative in full will naturally think of himself as disturbed person even after having had the sexual reassignment surgery.

Is it possible to reconcile the concept of autogynephilia with a narrative we can live with, or do people like me just have to accept that we are perverts?

That will be the topic of my next post.

[Correction September 2010: I have replaced the term "geunine girls". Even if it was placed in quotation marks, some have interpreted this to mean that I do not believe transwomen are genuine women. Of course I do. I no longer use the term "autogynephiliac" to describe transgender people, exactly because of the argument made in this post. I now call men harboring feminization fantasies for male to female crossdreamers. ]


UPDATE ON TERMINOLOGY

Since this blog post was written I have stopped using the terms "autogynephilia" and "autoandrophilia" to describe people. The reason for this is that the terms implicitly communicates an explanation for why some people get aroused by imagining themselves as the opposite sex . This explanation, that this is some kind of autoerotic paraphilia,  is both wrong and stigmatizing. Instead I use the neutral term "crossdreamers".

Click here for a discussion of the dark side of the autogynephilia theory.

The DSM-5 on Gender Dysphoria

$
0
0
The psychiatric manual of the American Psychiatric Association, the DSM-5, includes a very important chapter on gender dysphoria, transgender and transsexual. It is actually used  actively by transgender people in the transgender debate, but since it is not easily available we face a democratic problem. Some transsexual separatists are, for instance, misrepresenting the text in order to strengthen their own agenda.
DSM-5, cover.

I have therefore decided to make the most relevant sections of the chapter available as a service to my readers.

Special thanks to Brenda Lana Smith, who has transcribed significant parts of the text!

The text is presented as it is in the original, but I have added new paragraph divides in order to increase screen readability.

Click here to buy the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition: DSM-5

Jack

Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders Fifth Edition, DSM-5, Extract of Chapter on Gender Dysphoria


[p 451] In this chapter, there is one overreaching diagnosis of gender dysphoria, with separate developmentally approporiate criteria sets for children and for adolescents and adults. The area of sex and gender is highly controversial and has led to a proliferation of terms whose meanings vary over time and within and between disciplines. An additional source of confusion is that in English "sex" connotes both male /female and sexuality.

This chapter employs constructs and terms as they are widely used by clinicians from various disciplines with specialization in this area. In this chapter sex and sexual refers to biological indicators of male and female (understood in the context of reproductive capacity), such as in chromosomes, gonads, sex hormones, and nonambigious internal and external genitalia. 

Disorders of sex development denote conditions of inborn somatic deviations of the reproductive tract from the norm and/or discrepancies among the biological indicators of male and female. Cross-sex hormone treatment denotes the use of feminizing hormones in an individual assigned male at birth based on traditional biological indicators or the use of masculinizing hormones in an individual assigned female at birth.

The need to introduced the term gender arose with the realization that for individuals with conflicting or ambiguous biological indicators of sex (i.e. "intersex"), the lived role in society and/or the identification as male or female could not be uniformly associated with or predicted from the biological indicators and, later, that some individuals develop and identity as female or male at variance with their uniform set of classical biological indicators. Thus, gender is used to denote the public (and usually legally recognized) lived role as boy or girl, man or woman, but, in contrast to certain social constructionist theories, biological factors are seen to contributing, in interaction with social and psychological factors, to gender development.   

Gender assignment refers to the initial assignment as male or female. This occurs usually at birth and, thereby, yields the "natal gender". 

Gender-atypical refers to somatic behaviors that are not typical (in a statistical sense) of individuals with the same assigned gender in a given society and historical era; for behaviors that are not typical (in a statistical sense) of individuals with the same assigned gender in a given society and historical era; for behavior, gender-nonconforming is an alternative descriptive term.

Gender reassignment denotes an official (and usually legal) change of gender.

Gender identity is a category of social identity and refers to an individual's identification as male, female, or, occasionally, some category other than male or female.

Gender dysphoria as a general descriptive term refers to an individual's affective/cognitive discontent with the assigned gender but is more specifically defined when used as a diagnostic cateogory.

Transgender refers to the broad spectrum of individuals who transiently or persistently identify with a gender different from their natal gender.

Transsexual denotes an individual who seeks, or has undergone, a social transition from male to female or female to male, which in many, but not all, cases also involves a somatic transition by cross-sex hormone treatment and genital surgery (sex reassignment surgery).

Gender dysphoria  refers to the distress that may accompany the incongruence between one's experienced or expressed gender and one's assigned gender. Although not all individuals will experience distress as result of such incongruence, many are distressed if the desired physical interventions by means of hormones and/or surgery are not available. The current term is more descriptive than the previous DSM-IV term gender identity disorder and focuses on dysphoria as the clinical problem, not identity per se. 

Diagnostic Criteria


[p. 452] Gender Dysphoria in Children 302.6 (F64.2)

[Not included here].

Gender Dysphoria in Adolescents and Adults 302.95 (F64.1)

A. A marked incongruence between one's experience/expressed gender and assigned gender, of at least 6 months' duration, as manifested by at least two of the following:

1. A marked incongruence between one's experienced/expressed gender and primary and/or secondary sex characteristics (or in young adolescents, the anticipated sex characteristics).

2. A strong desire to be rid of one's primary and /or secondary sex characteristics because of a marked incongruence with one's experienced/expressed gender (or in young adolescents, a desire to prevent the development of the anticipated secondary sex characteristics)

3. A strong desire for the primary and/or secondary sex characteristics of the other gender.

4. A strong desire to be of the other gender (or some alternative gender different from one's assigned gender).

5. A strong desire to be treated as the other gender (or some alternative gender different from one's assigned gender).

6. A strong conviction that one has the typical feelings and reactions of the other gender (or some alternative gender different from one's assigned gender).

[p. 453] B. The condition is associated with clinically significant distress or impairment in social, occupational, or other important areas of functioning.

Specify if:
With a disorder of sex development (e.g., a congenital adrenogenital disorder such as 255.2 [E25.0] congenital adrenal hyperplasia or 259.50 [E.34.50] androgen insensitivity syndrome).
Coding note: Code the disorder of sex development as well as gender dysphoria.

Specify if:
Posttransition: The individual has transitioned to full-time living in the desired gender (with or without legalization of gender change) and has undergone (or is preparing to have) at least one cross-sex medical procedure or treatment regimen—namely, regular cross-sex hormone treatment or gender reassignment surgery confirm the desired gender (e.g., penectomy, vaginoplasty in a natal male, phalloplasty in a natal female).

Specifiers

The posttransition specifier may be used in the context of continuing treatment procedures that serve to support the new gender assignment.

Diagnostic Features

Individuals with gender dysphoria have a marked incongruence between the gender they have been assigned to (usually at birth, referred to a natal gender) and their experience/expressed gender. This discrepancy is the core component of the diagnosis. The must also be evidence of distress about this incongruence. 

Experienced gender may include alternative gender identities beyond binary stereotypes. Consequently, the distress is not limited to a desire to simply be of the other gender, but may include a desire to be of an alternative gender, provided that differs from the individual's assigned gender.

Gender dysphoria manifests itself differently in different age groups.

Prepubertal natal girls with gender dysphoria may express the wish to be a boy, assert they are a boy, or assert they will grow up to be a man. They prefer boys' clothing and hairstyles, are often perceived by strangers as boys, and may ask to be called by a boy's name. Usually, the display intense negative reactions to parental attempts to have them wear dresses or other feminine attire. Some may refuse to attend school or social events where such clothes are required.

These girls may demonstrate marked cross-gender identification in role-playing, dreams, and fantasies. Contact sports, rough-and-tumble play, traditional boyhood games, and boys as playmates are most often preferred. They show little interest in stereotypically feminine toys (e.g., dolls) or activities (e.g., feminine dress-up or role-play). Occasionally, they refuse to urinate in a sitting position. Some natal girls may express a desire to have a penis or claim to have a penis or that they will grow one when older. They may also state that they do not want to develop breasts or menstruate.

Prepubertal natal boys with gender dysphoria may wish to be a girl or assert they are a girl or that they will grow up to be a woman. They have a preference for dressing in girls' or women's clothes or may improvise clothing from available materials (e.g., using towels, aprons, and scarves for long hair or skirts). These children may role-play female figures (e.g., playing "mother') and often are intensely interested in female fantasy figures.

Traditional feminine activities, stereotypical games, and pastimes (e.g., "playing house"; drawing feminine pictures, watching television or videos of favorite female characters) are most often preferred. Stereotypical female-type dolls (e.g., Barbie) are often favorite toys, and girls are their preferred playmates. They avoid rough-and-tumble play and competitive sports and have little interest in stereotypically masculine toys (e.g., cars and trucks). Some may pretend not to have a penis and insist on sitting to urinate. More [p. 454] rarely, they may state that they find their penis or testes disgusting that they wish them removed, or that they have, or wish to have a vagina.

In young adolescents with gender dysphoria, clinical features may resemble those of children or adults with the condition, depending on developmental level. As secondary sex characteristics of young adolescents are not yet fully developed, this individuals may not state dislike of them, but they are concerned about imminent physical changes.

In adults with gender dysphoria, the discrepancy between experienced gender and physical sex characteristics is often, but not always, accompanied by a desire to be rid of primary and/or secondary sex characteristics and/or a strong desire to acquire some primary and/or secondary sex characteristics of the other gender. 

To varying degrees, adults with gender dysphoria may adopt the behavior, clothing, and mannerisms of the experienced gender. They feel uncomfortable being regarded by others, or function in society, as members of their assigned gender. Some adults may have a strong desire to be of a different gender and treated as such, and they may have an inner certainty to feel and respond as the experienced gender without seeking medical treatment to alter body characteristics. They may find other ways to resolve the incongruence between experienced/expressed and assigned gender by partially living in the desired role or by adopting a gender role neither conventionally male nor conventionally female.

Associated Features Supporting Diagnosis

When visible signs of puberty develop, natal boys may shave their legs at the first signs of hair growth. They sometimes bind their genitals to make erections less visible. Girls may bind their breasts, walk with a stoop, or use loose sweaters to make breasts less visible. Increasingly, adolescents request, or may obtain without medical prescription and supervision, hormonal suppressors ("blockers") of gonadal steroids (e.g., gonadotropin-releasing hormone [GnRH] analog, spironolactone). 

Clinically referred adolescents often want hormone treatment and many also wish for gender reassignment surgery. Adolescents living in an accepting environment may openly express the desire to be and be treated as the experienced gender and dress partly or completely as the experienced gender, have a hairstyle typical of the experienced gender, preferentially see friendship with peers of the other gender, and adopt a new first name consistent with the experienced gender. 

Older adolescents when sexually active, usually do not show or allow partners to touch their sexual organs. For adults with an aversion toward their genitals, sexual activity is constrained by the preference that their genitals not be seen or touched by their partners. Some adults may seek hormone treatment (sometimes without medical prescription and supervision) and gender reassignment surgery. Others are satisfied with either hormone treatment or surgery alone.

Adolescents and adults with gender dysphoria before gender reassignment are at increased risk for suicidal ideation, suicide attempts, and suicides. After gender reassignment, adjustment may vary, and suicide risk may persist.

Prevalence

For natal adult males, prevalence ranges from 0.005% to 0.014%, and for natal females from 0.002% to 0.003%. Since not all adults seeking hormone treatment and surgical reassignment attend specialty clinics, clinics vary by age group. In children, sex ratios of natal boys to girls range from 2:1 to 4.5:1. In adolescents, the sex ratio is close to parity in adults, the sex ratio favors natal males, with ratios ranging from 1:1 to 6.1:1. In two countries, the sex ratio appears to favor natal females (Japan 2.2:1; Poland 3.4:1).

Development and Course

Because expression of gender dysphoria varies with age, there are separate criteria sets for children versus adolescents and adults. Criteria for children are defined in a more concrete, [p. 455] behavioral manner than those for adolescents and adults. 

Many of the core criteria draw on well-document behavioral gender differences between typically developing boys and girls. Young children are less likely than older children, adolescents, and adults to express extreme and persistent anatomic dysphoria. In adolescents and adults, incongruence between experienced gender and somatic sex is a central feature of the diagnosis. Factors relate to distress and impairment also vary with age. A very young child may show signs of distress (e.g., intense crying) only when parents tell the child that he or she is "really" not a member of the other gender but only "desires" to be. Distress may not be manifest in social environment support of the child's desire to live in the role of the other gender and may emerge only if the desire is interfered with. 

In adolescents and adults, distress may manifest because of strong incongruence between experienced gender and somatic sex. Such distress may, however, be mitigated by supportive environments and knowledge that biomedical treatments exist to reduce incongruence. Impairment (e.g., school refusal, development of depression, anxiety, and substance abuse) may be a consequence of gender dysphoria.

Gender dysphoria without a disorder of sex development. For clinic-referred children, onset of cross-gender behaviors is usually between ages 2 and 4 years. This corresponds to the development time period in which most typically developing children begin expressing gendered behaviors and the expressed desire to be the other gender may be present, or, more rarely, labeling oneself as a member of the other gender may occur. In some cases, the expressed desire to be the other gender appears later, usually at entry into elementary school.

A small minority of children express discomfort with their sexual anatomy or will state the desire to have a sexual anatomy corresponding to the experienced gender ("anatomic dysphoria"). Expressions of anatomic dysphoria become more common as children with gender dysphoria approach and anticipate puberty.

Rates of persistence of gender dysphoria from childhood into adolescence or adulthood vary. In natal males 12% to 50%. Persistence of gender dysphoria is modestly correlated with dimensional measures of severity ascertained at the time of a childhood baseline assessment. In one sample of natal males, lower socioeconomic background was also modestly correlated with persistence.

It is unclear if particular therapeutic approaches to gender dysphoria in children are related to rates of long-term persistence. Extant follow-up samples consisted of children receiving no formal therapeutic intervention or receiving therapeutic interventions of various types, ranging from active efforts to reduce gender dysphoria to a more neutral, "watchful waiting" approach. It is unclear if children "encouraged" or support to live socially in the desired gender will show higher rates of persistence, since such children have not yet been followed longitudinally in a systematic manner.

For both natal male and female children showing persistence, almost all are usually attracted to individuals of their natal sex. For natal male children whose gender dysphoria does not persist, the majority are androphilic (sexually attracted to males) and often self-identify as gay or homosexual (ranging from 63% to 100%). In natal female children whose gender dysphoria does not persist, the percentage who are gynephilic (sexually attracted to females) and self-identify as gay or homosexual (ranging from 32% to 50%).

In both adolescent and adult natal males, there are two broad trajectories for development of gender dysphoria: early onset and late onset, Early-onset gender dysphoria starts in childhood and continues into adolescence and adulthood; or, there is and intermittent period in which the gender dysphoria desists and these individuals self-identify as gay or homosexual, followed by a recurrence of gender dysphoria.

Late-onset gender dysphoria occurs around puberty or much later in life. Some of these individuals report having had a desire to be of the other gender in childhood that was not expressed verbally to others. Others do not recall any signs of childhood gender dysphoria. For adolescent males with late-onset gender dysphoria, parent often report surprise because they did not see signs of gender [p. 456]  dysphoria during childhood. Expressions of anatomic dysphoria are more common and salient in adolescents and adults once secondary sex characteristics have developed.

Adolescent and adult natal males with early-onset gender dysphoria are almost always sexually attracted to men (androphilic). Adolescents and adults with late-onset gender dysphoria frequently engage in transvestic behavior with sexual excitement. The majority of these individual are gynephlic, or sexually attracted to other posttransition natal males with late-onset gender dysphoria. A substantial percentage of adult males with late-onset gender dysphoria cohabit with or are married to natal females. After gender transition, many self-identify as lesbian. Among adult natal males with gender dysphoria, the early-onset group seeks out clinical care for hormone treatment and reassignment surgery at an earlier age than does the late onset group. The late-onset group may have more fluctuations in the degree of gender dysphoria and be more ambivalent about and less likely satisfied after gender reassignment surgery.

In both adolescent and adult natal females, the most common course is the early-onset form of gender dysphoria. The late-onset form is much less common in natal females compared to natal males. As in natal males with gender dysphoria, there may have been a period in which the gender dysphoria, clinical consultation is sought, often with the desire for hormone treatment and reassignment surgery. Parents of natal adolescent females with the late-onset form also report surprise, as no signs of childhood gender dysphoria were evident. Expressions of anatomic dysphoria are much more common and salient in adolescents and adults than in children.

Adolescent and adult natal females with early-onset gender dysphoria are almost always gynephilic. Adolescents and adults with the late-onset form of gender dysphoria are usually androphilic, and after gender self-identify as gay men. Natal females with late-onset form do not have co-occurring transvestic behavior with sexual excitement.

Gender dysphoria in association with a disorder of sex development. Most individuals with a disorder of sex development who develop gender dysphoria have already come to medical attention at an early age. For many, starting at birth, issues of gender assignment were raised by physicians and parents. Moreover, as infertility is quite common for the group, physicians are more willing to perform cross-sex hormone treatments and genital surgery before adulthood.

Disorder of sex development in general are frequently associated with gender-atypical behavior starting in early childhood. However, in the majority of cases, this does not lead to gender dysphoria. As individuals with a disorder of sex development become aware of their medical history and condition, many experience uncertainty about their gender. However, most do not progress to gender transition. Gender dysphoria and gender transition may vary considerably as a function of a disorder of sex development, its severity, and assigned gender.


Risk and Prognostic Factors

Temperamental. For individuals with gender dysphoria without a disorder of sex development, atypical gender behavior among individuals with early-onset gender dysphoria develops in early preschool age, and it is possible that a high degree of atypicality makes the development of gender dysphoria and its persistence in adolescence and adulthood likely.

Environmental. Among individuals with gender dysphoria without a disorder of sex development, males with gender dysphoria (in both childhood and adolescence) more commonly have older brothers than do males without the condition. Additional predisposing [p 457] factors under consideration, especially in individuals with late-onset gender dysphoria (adolescence, adulthood), include habitual fetishistic transvestism developing in autgynephilia (i.e., sexual arousal associated with the thought or image of oneself as a woman) and other forms more general social, psychological, or developmental problems.

Genetic and physiological. For individuals with gender dysphoria without a disorder of sex development, some genetic contribution is suggested by evidence for (weak) familiality of transsexualism among nontwin siblings, increased concordance for transsexualism in monozygotic compared with dizygotic same-sex twins, and some degree of heritability of gender dysphoria. As to endocrine findings, no endogenous systemic abnormalities increased androgen levels have been found in 46,XY individuals, whereas there appear to be an increased androgen levels (in the range found in hirsute women but far below normal male levels) in 46,XX individuals. Overall, current evidence is insufficient to label gender dysphoria without a disorder of sex development as a for of intersexuality limited to central nervous system.

In gender dysphoria associated with a disorder of sex development, the likelihood of later gender dysphoria is increased if prenatal production and utilization (via receptor sensitivity) of androgens are grossly atypical relative to what is usually seen in individuals with the same assigned gender. Examples include 46,XY individuals with a history of normal male prenatal hormone milieu but inborn nonhormonal genital defects (as in cloacal bladder exstrophy or penile agenesis) and who have assigned to the female gender.

The likelihood of gender dysphoria is further enhanced by additional, prolonged, highly gender-atypical postnatal androgen exposure with somatic virilization as may occur in female-raised and noncastrated 46,XY individuals with 5-alpha reductase-2 deficiency or 17-beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase-3 deficiency or in female-raised 46,XX individuals with classical congenital adrenal hyperplasia with prolonged periods of non-adherence to glucocorticoid replacement therapy. However, the prenatal androgen milieu is more closely related to gendered behavior than to gender identity. Many individuals with disorder of sex development and marked gender-atypical behavior do not develop gender dysphoria. There appears to be a high rate of gender dysphoria and patient-initiated gender change from assigned female to male than from assigned male to female in 46,XY individuals with a disorder of sex development.


Culture-Related Diagnostic Issues

Individuals with gender dysphoria have been reported across many countries and cultures. The equivalent of gender dysphoria has also been reported in individuals living in cultures with institutionalized gender categories other than male or female. It is unclear whether with these individuals the diagnostic criteria for gender dysphoria would be met.


Diagnostic Markers

Individuals with somatic disorder of sex development show some correlation of final gender outcome with the degree of prenatal androgen production and utilization. However, the correlation is not robust enough for the biological factor, where ascertainable to replace a detailed and comprehensive diagnostic interview evaluation for gender dysphoria.


Functional Consequences of Gender Dysphoria

Preoccupation with cross-gender wishes may develop at all ages after the first 2-3 years of childhood and often interfere with daily activities. In older children, failure to develops age-typical same-sex peer relationships and skills may lead to isolation from peer groups and to distress. Some children may refuse to attend school because of teasing and harassment [p. 458] or pressure to dress in attire associated with their assigned sex.

Also in adolescents and adults, preoccupation with cross-gender wishes often interferes with daily activities. Relationship difficulties, including, sexual relationship problems, are common, and functioning at school or at work may be impaired.

Gender dysphoria, along with atypical gender expression, is associated with high levels of stigmatization, discrimination, and victimization, leading to negative self-concept, increased rates of mental disorder comorbidity, school dropout, and economic marginalization, including unemployment, with attendant social and mental health risks, especially in individuals from resource-poor family backgrounds. In addition, these individuals' access to health services and mental health services may be impeded by structural barriers, such as institutional discomfort or inexperience in working with this patient population.


Differential Diagnosis

Nonconformity to gender roles. Gender dysphoria should be distinguished from simple nonconformity to stereotypical gender role behavior by the strong desire to be of another gender than the assigned one and by the extent and pervasiveness of gender-variant activities and interests.

The diagnosis is not meant to merely describe nonconformity to stereotypical gender role behavior (e.g., "tomboyism" in girls, "girly-boy" behavior in boys, occasional cross-dress in adult men). Given the increased openness of atypical gender expressions by individuals across the entire range of transgender spectrum, it is important that the clinical diagnosis be limited to those individuals whose distress and impairment meet the specified criteria.

Transvestic disorder. Transvestic disorder occurs in heterosexual (or bisexual) adolescent and adult males (rarely in females) for whom cross-dressing behavior generates sexual excitement and cause distress and/or impairment without drawing their primary gender into question. It is occasionally accompanied by gender dysphoria. An individual with transvestic disorder who also has clinically significant gender dysphoria can be given both diagnoses. In many cases of late-onset gender dysphoria in gynephilic natal males, transvestic behavior with sexual excitement is a precursor.

Body dysmorphic disorder. An individual with body dysmorphic disorder focuses on the alteration or removal of a specific body part because it is perceived as abnormally formed, not because it represents a repudiated assigned gender. When an individual's presentation meets criteria for both gender dysphoria and bod dysmorphic disorder, both diagnoses can be given. Individuals wishing to have a healthy limb amputated (termed by some body integrity identity disorder) because it makes them feel more "complete" usually do not wish to change gender, but rather desire to live as an amputee or as a disabled person.

Schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders. In schizophrenia, there may rarely be delusions of belonging to some other gender. In the absence of psychotic symptoms, insistence by an individual with gender dysphoria that he or she is of some other gender is not considered a delusion. Schizophrenia (or other psychotic disorders) and gender dysphoria may co-occur.

Other clinical presentations. Some individuals with an emasculinization desire who develop an alternative nonmale/nonfemale gender identity do have a presentation that meets criteria for gender dysphoria. However, some males see castration and/or penectomy for aesthetic reasons or to remove psychological effects of androgens without changing male identity, in these cases the criteria for gender dysphoria are not met.


Comorbidity

Clinically referred children with gender dysphoria show elevated levels of emotional and behavioral problems—most commonly, anxiety, disruptive and impulse-control, and depressive [p. 459] disorders. In prepubertal children, increasing age is associated with having more behavioral or emotional problems, this is related to the increasing non-acceptance of gender-variant behavior by others. In older children, gender-variant behavior often leads to peer ostracism, which may lead to more behavioral problems.

The prevalence of mental health problems differs among cultures; these differences may also be related to differences in attitudes toward gender variance in children. However, also in some non-Western cultures, anxiety has been found to be relatively common in individuals with gender dysphoria, even in cultures with accepting attitudes toward gender-variant behavior.

Autism spectrum disorder is more prevalent in clinically referred children with gender dysphoria than in the general population. Clinically referred adolescents with gender dysphoria appear to have comorbid mental disorders, with anxiety and depressive disorder being the most common. As in children, autism spectrum disorder is more prevalent in clinically referred adolescents with gender dysphoria than in the general population. Clinically referred adults with gender dysphoria may have coexisting mental health problems, most commonly anxiety and depressive disorders.

Other Specified Gender Dysphoria 302.6 (F64.8)

[Not included here]

Unspecified Gender Dysphoria 302.6 (F64.9)

[Not included here]

The DSM-5 and ICD-11 on Transgender, Gender Dysphoria and Transsexualism

$
0
0
The fact that the DSM-5 text on transgender and transsexual is not available online has become a democratic problem. Transsexual separatist are now misrepresenting the chapter on gender dysphoria for political purposes. I have therefore decided to make parts of the text available to my readers.

In a recent debate on tumblr the DSM-5 chapter on gender dysphoria has been used in support of a new myth created by so-called "truscum" transsexual separatists.
DSM-5

The myth says that the word "transgender" refers to people with gender dysphoria only, and that other gender variant people who use the term transgender are offending "true" transgender men and women.

It seems the main motive for this attempted hijacking of the term is that many of them find the word "transsexual" embarrassing.  I also suspect that many of them would rather not be seen in company with crossdressers, drag queens and other gender-nonconforming people, and that this is another reason for this cleansing of the transgender concept.

I have seen many instances of truscum claiming that the American psychiatric manual, the DSM-5, requires gender dysphoria for a transgender diagnosis. Basically these online activists are trying to mobilize the medical establishment in their support.

The DSM distinguishes between transgender and transsexual

The problem is that none of them have actually read the DSM-5. If they had they would have known that the DSM does not require gender dysphoria for someone to call themselves transgender. Indeed, the word the DSM uses to describe the class of trans people the truscum want to protect is "transsexual".


Transgender is understood as a broad umbrella term encompassing all types of gender variant people. The manual explicitly states that  "Transgender refers to the broad spectrum of individuals who transiently or persistently identify with a gender different from their natal gender." And yes, the word "gender" is meant to include non-binary identities as well.

The only reason the separatists can get away with such untruths is the fact that no one has read the original text. I have therefore decided to share parts of the text with other trans people so that we can get a more open and fact-based debate.

It so happens that this chapter of the DSM gives a very good summary of where the psychiatric communities world wide stand right now as regards gender variance. I do not support everything that is written here, but compared to previous editions the American Psychiatric Association has come a long way towards depathologizing gender variance. The main obstacle now, is not this chapter, but the one on "transvestic disorders".

The DSM subwork group on gender dysphoria

The subwork group responsible for this chapter consisted of Peggy T. Cohen-Kettenis, Ph.D. from the University Medical Center in Amsterdam (Chair): Jack Drescher, M.D. from New York;  Heino F. L. Meyer-Bahlburg, a German born professor of clinical psychology (in psychiatry) at Columbia University, New York; and  Dr. rer. nat., Friedemann Pfäfflin, M.D.,  a German specialist in psychiatry and psychotherapy.

The chapter therefore also reflects international trends in sex and gender research. That makes it harder to argue that it is "obvious" that transgender condition requires gender dysphoria.

The WHO manual on diseases

The DSM is an American manual. Internationally the UN International Classification of Diseases (ICD)  is more widely used (although doctors world wide will look at the DSM as well).

Note that DSM subworking group members Cohen-Kettenis and Drescher are also members of the World Health Organization’s Working Group on the Classification of Sexual Disorders and Sexual Health.

This group will address sex and gender diagnoses in WHO's forthcoming revisions of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11).  That manual is expected to be published in 2017. The WHO most often follow changes made in the DSM.

Some countries have already made changes to the current ICD edition, removing the sections on "transvestism" (i.e. crossdressing and crossdreaming).

In a recent paper the ICD-11 Working Group on the Classification of Sexual Disorders and Sexual Health, states that it "believes it is now appropriate to abandon a psychopathological model of transgender people based on 1940s conceptualizations of sexual deviance and to move towards a model that is (1) more reflective of current scientific evidence and best practices; (2) more responsive to the needs, experience, and human rights of this vulnerable population; and (3) more supportive of the provision of accessible and high-quality healthcare services."

In a preliminary consensus meeting on the ICD-11 arranged by WPATH in 2013, there was no mention of reinterpreting the word transgender to mean the same as transsexual. Indeed, the title of the process was "WPATH consensus process regarding transgender and transsexual-related diagnoses in ICD-11" -- a clear indication of the two words being interpreted differently.

Before the meeting the working group had proposed the term "transsexualism" to "gender incongruence", moving gender incongruence out of the chapter on mental and behavioral disorders, and deleting the categories "dual role transvestism" and "fetishistic transvestism".

In other words: Not only is the ICD-11 process moving in the same positive direction as the DSM; it is taking this process further, suggesting that one removes crossdressing and crossdreaming altogether. The term transgender retains its broad meaning.

The DSM-5 chapter on gender dysphoria

You can read an excerpt of the DSM-5 chapter on gender dysphoria here! 

Special thanks to Brenda Lana Smith, who has transcribed significant parts of the text.

Click here for a scanned PDF that also includes the chapter on transvestic disorder.

Click here to buy the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition: DSM-5

See also: "Minding the body: Situating gender identity diagnoses in the ICD-11" by Jack Dreschler, Peggy Cohen-Kettenis and Sam Winter, International Review of Psychiatry, December 2012; 24(6): 568–577

On Anne Vitale's theory on testosterone-poisoning in MTF crossdreamers

$
0
0
Sidebar to the Crossdreamers.com blog post "Does the effects of hormones on transgender prove that crossdreaming has a biological component?"
Anne Vitale presents a theory aimed at explaining dysphoria
in MTF crossdressers and crossdreamers.
Illustration: Jupiterimages


One of the leading experts on crossdreamers  is Dr. Anne Vitale. She is herself a transsexual woman, and has helped a large number of transgender patients, from those who identify fully with their target sex and want to transition (transsexuals), to non-transsexual crossdressers.

She has written one of the best books on transgender conditions that also covers crossdressers and crossdreamers.

I must admit she sometimes appear a bit too essentialist for my taste. She writes, for instance, that the defeminization of the brain in perinatal males experience leaves them "incapable of female behavior and sensibility," (Perinatal refers to the period around childbirth).

I find no support for the idea of a unique "female behavior and sensibility", as no temperaments, interests, abilities  or behaviors are exclusive to one gender. The sense of feeling like a man or a woman cannot be reduced to a function of the way you behave. (More about this here!)

Still, her idea about crossdreamers and male to female transsexuals being poisoned by testosterone is interesting.
Anne Vitale (from her home page)

In her book The Gendered Self, Vitale suggests that the variation we seen between transsexual and non-transsexual male to female transgender is caused by variation in the prenatal androgenization/defeminization processes, leading to different degrees of feminization of the brain, including female like hormone receptors.

In a separate note on hormones she writes:
"It is beyond dispute that there are both androgen and estrogen receptors in the brain. Genetic males normally have more active androgen receptors than women and women have more active estrogen receptors than men. That this normal distribution of estrogen and androgen receptor cells can be different in some individuals appears to be a possibility. It therefore follows that androgenic and estrogenic compounds will result in a modified-to-counter expected behavior in affected individuals. For reasons beyond the scope of this Note and as counterintuitive as it may seem, it can only be assumed that testosterone plays a crucial role in forcing certain male individuals to crossdress and experience femininity to the maximum degree possibly."

Vitale predicts that eventually we will find that as testosterone levels rise above some threshold in the daily lives of male to female crossdreamers the enzyme aromatase becomes active and temporarily converts testosterone into estradiol/estrogen. This is creating a strong desire in them to dress and live, even if only temporarily, as a woman.

She illustrates this theory with stories of MTF transgender who have "detransitioned" back to male, after having lived as women. As soon as their testosterone levels again reaches normal male levels, the desire to become a woman returns.

The idea that the body can turn testosterone into estrogen when it reaches a certain level is definitely correct. (See sidebar on MTF hormone replacement therapy) The body/mind system is supposed to be self-regulating in this respect. It is also true that this function may "fail" leading to too low or too high levels of testosterone in men.

What I find confusing, though, is that turning testosterone into estrogen in MTF crossdreamers should force them to desire to dress and live as women.

My first objection refers to what I have already mentioned above, i.e. that being a woman is reduced to some kind of side-effect of a "female" hormone. As far as I know, pumping a woman full of testosterone will not make her feel like a man (although it may make her extremely horny and even more aggressive and emotionally unstable). Nor have I seen any research that indicates that giving a man strong doses of estrogen will make him feel like a woman. This theory was popular in the early 20th century, but has since been dismissed as too simplistic.

As far as I know, most biological oriented gender researchers now agree that hormones play an important role in gender identity formation during the pre-natal phase, and later during puberty. As soon as a masculinized brain has been developed, however, adding estrogen will not change this  person's gender identity in any way. (Kerukels and Cohen-Kettenis)

Vitale provides a possible explanation for this puzzle in her note, namely that the MTF transgender crossdreamers are differently wired as regards hormone receptors in the brain. This may explain why these male bodied people (and not men in general) feel the urge to crossdress and crossdream when producing their own "overdose" of estrogen.

Still, if that is the case, this production of estrogen should have some of the same calming effect taking estrogen and antiandrogen pills has on MTF crossdreamers; it should reduce their sex drive and therefore also the more obsessive compulsive drive we find in some (but not all) crossdreamers.

This is not what is happening.

However, I admit I might be missing something here. Their own "overproduction" of estrogen may, for instance, not have the same libido-reducing effect as antiandrogens have. I suppose only the excess levels of testosterone are converted into estrogen. There may still be typical male levels of testosterone in the system,  and this may explain why the sex drive remains high. I don't know. Vitale does not say.

I must admit that I find the explanation I am given by local sexologists simpler: The distress and dissonance felt by gender dysphoric MTF crossdressers and crossdreamers is caused by some kind of mismatch between their brain hormone receptor system and the typical male levels of testosterone.

There is simply too much testosterone going around, which not only accentuates the feeling of "wrongness", but may also -- in some cases -- lead to a sex drive that makes the dysphoria obsessive.

Vitale's two type model for MTF transgender

Note also that Vitale is using her theory about testosterone-poisoned MTF crossdreamers as a basis for a three type typology of  transgender. The MTF crossdreamers constitutes Group 3 (G3), who "look and act unambiguously as society expects them to but privately identify as the opposite gender."

They are therefore a completely different category from Group 1 (G1), who "have a high degree of cross-sexed gender identity" and where the prenatal androgenization/defeminization process has been minimal, "leaving the default female identity largely intact." (Vitale 2010, p. 19. Her G2 group consists of FTM transgender. There are no FTM crossdreamers in her world.).

This is simply another variant of the traditional late onset/early onset, primary /secondary and "homosexual transsexual"/"autogynephilic transsexual" that has caused so much misinformation, confusion and suffering in the transgender community.

To sort MTF transgender into groups like these for analytical purposes may be defended, but to say this constitutes some kind of essential difference is not only politically toxic (as all G3 trans women are immediately labelled as inferior trans women), but the divide has also been debunked by other researchers (see for instance my presentation of the recent Veale-study of transgender).

I do not believe in sorting transgender people into simplistic categories based on observed "female expressions of femininity", in the way Vitale does (or Ray Blanchard does in his "autogynephilia" theory, for that matter.)

The reason for this is that the stigma attached to being male to female transgender is so big that it causes all kinds of psychological types of repression of both sexuality and gender identities, making the immediate appearance of a MTF transgender or genderqueer person an unreliable tool for diagnosis.

Most male to female crossdressers, crossdreamers or transsexuals have been conditioned to hide any sign of femininity or female identity. This is why so many of them are so traumatized in the first place.  Vitale writes extensively about this kind of repression, but falls into the trap of dividing trans women into two distinct categories, anyway, and that is unfortunate.

A final note to readers who find this sidenote via search engines: 

Even if I believe that there is a biological component to transgender conditions, crossdreaming and crossdressing included, this does not mean that such identities and experiences can be reduced to a simple biological factor only.

I believe our sense of self is the end result of a complex interplay between biological, psychological, cultural and social factors. This would also partly explain why some MTF crossdreamers are transsexual and identify completely with their target sex, while other continue to identify as men. This would also explain why only a third of MTF crossdreamers and crossdressers seem to suffer from severe gender dysphoria.

If you want to make comments to this sidebar, go to the main blog post over at Crossdreamers.com.

...................

Anne Vitale home page

Anne Vitale: "Testosterone Toxicity Implicated in Male-To-Female Transsexuals? Some thoughts." T-Note 15 2009.

Anne Vitale: The Gendered Self, Flyfisher Press, Point Reyes Station 2010.

Baudewijntje PC Kreukels and Peggy T Cohen-Kettenis: "Male Gender Identity and Masculine Behavior: the Role of Sex Hormones in Brain Development"in  Hormonal Therapy for Male Sexual Dysfunction, First Edition. Edited by Mario Maggi. © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Published 2012 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

More references in main blog post.





On male to female hormone replacement therapy

$
0
0
Sidebar to the Crossdreamers.com blog post "Does the effects of hormones on transgender prove that crossdreaming has a biological component?"
Illustration: designer491


The complexity of the effects sex hormones have on our minds and bodies is mind-blowing, and can be hard to grasp.

On this page I have gathered a few quotes from medical experts that might be of help.

Estrogen refers to feminizing hormones, and includes estradiol. Androgens refers to masculinizing hormones, including testosterone.

Note that hormone therapy is not a simple "adding more A" or "adding more E" to the body. Instead you add hormones that interfere with some rather complex feedback loops of hormone production in the mind/body-system.

You may, for instance, help your body transform your own testosterone into estrogen. You may also influence the way your brain absorbs and make use of sex hormones (i.e. influence hormone reception as opposed to hormone production). If the brain stops processing a hormone, it does not matter how much of it you find in your blood stream.

Male or female hormone replacement therapy

Here is an extract from Thomas E. Bevan presentation in the book The Psychobiology of Transsexualism and Transgenderism:

"Oral estradiol [estrogen] blocks release of hypothalamic gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) that normally stimulates release of testosterone through other hormones. Release of GnRH in the hypothalamus causes the release of luteinizing and follicle-stimulating hormones in the pituitary. This, in turn, triggers synthesis and release of testosterone from the testes. Excessive testosterone feeds back on the GnRH mechanism in the hypothalamus and reduces the testosterone level. The GnRH feedback mechanism responds, not only to testosterone but also estradiol and progesterone.


Estradiol feminizes the body and stimulates growth of stromal tissue in the breast that determines breast structure. Combined with progesterone, estradiol also develops a second type of tissue, the lobular tissue of the breast, which is the actual milk-secreting tissue. In HT [hormone replacement therapy], the dosage of oral estradiol should be minimized because the most severe adverse side effects of MTF HT are believed to result from estrogens (...). Estrogen also increases the level of sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG), which binds to testosterone and inactivates it. Estrogen also seems to maintain sexual interest even when testosterone levels are minimized (...).

Testosterone blocking agents [antiandrogens] are usually used to minimize the dosage of estradiol needed. Spironolactone blocks both testosterone release and blocks testosterone receptors that transmit messages to body cells. However, spironolactone is also an antihypertensive and potassium-sparing drug that results in lower blood pressure. For this reason, blood pressure and potassium levels should be monitored if it is prescribed. Spironolactone also reduces libido and arrests male pattern baldness. (...)"

If you are  confused about the feedback loops of this system, the following presentation by Brooklyn Urology may be of help:

"The Anterior Pituitary  (AP) releases 2 hormones known as Leutinizing Hormone (LH) and Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH), which are under regulation by the Hypothalamus, a section in the brain, that releases Gonadotropin Releasing Hormone (GnRH).

GnRH travels through very small vessels in the brain until it reaches the AP which in turns regulates the release of LH and FSH, both of which travel through the blood stream until they reach their designated target, the TESTIS (or Ovaries)!

LH is the hormone that tells cells in the testicle to produce Testosterone (Estrogen in the ovary) while  FSH is in charge of sperm (follicle) production in the Testis (Ovary).  After Testosterone is secreted into circulation, it can also self regulate itself.  Too much T and it will send a signal to Slow down both the Hypothalamus and AP."

Marshall Dahl and his coauthors write:

"Endocrinologic feminization [hormone replacement therapy for male to female transgender] is achieved by (a) direct or indirect suppression of the effects of androgens, and (b) induction of female physical characteristics. 

Androgen suppression can be achieved by: 

  • agents that suppress the production of gonadotrophic releasing hormone (GNRH) or are GNRH antagonists: e.g., progestational agents 
  • suppressing the production of luteinizing hormone: e.g., progestational agents, cyproterone acetate 
  • interfering with the production of testosterone or metabolism of testosterone to dihydrotestosterone (DHT): e.g., spironolactone, finasteride, cyproterone acetate 
  • interfering with the binding of androgens to receptors in target tissues: e.g., spironolactone, cyproterone acetate, flutamide 

Estrogen is the principal agent used to induce female characteristics, and works primarily by direct stimulation of receptors in target tissues.Although estrogen also suppresses luteinizing hormone (LH), the estrogen dose required for effective LH suppression is dangerously high."

Female to male hormone replacement therapy.

Marshall Dahl and his coauthors write:

"Endocrinologic masculinization is achieved by the use of testosterone to induce male physical characteristics. Testosterone works primarily by direct stimulation of receptors in target tissues; clinical effects correlate to elevation of serum testosterone level to a male reference range, rather than a decrease in serum estradiol. Testosterone also has antigonadotropic action in high doses."


Marshall Dahl et al: Endocrine Therapy for Transgender Adults in British Columbia:
Suggested Guidelines , Vancouver 2006.





Autogynephilia defined (original version)

$
0
0

This is the original version of the Crossdreamer.com 2009 introduction of autogynephilia. Since this version could be interpreted as support for the theory, I have replaced it with a new.

[Click here for a more recent discussion of autogynephilia!]

When I started this blog last year, it was to have a place for discussing a phenomenon so rare that I it is never mentioned in popular media.

There are men (like me) that fantasize about having a woman's body and get sexually aroused by this. If you met me, you would find no sign of this inner woman in my outward appearance.

I do not look particularly feminine (quite the opposite, actually). I dress like a man, and have many typical male interests (including science and technology). I love women and have a  girlfriend.

Gay or what?

It is more than a little confusing, because -- even if I cannot for my life think of having sex with a man as a man -- my female self has no such scruples. I could be a closet homosexual, of course, living in denial. Still, going down a busy city street, I have only eyes for the women and rarely remember the men.

Sometimes I wish I was a homosexual, because then I get out of the closet and start living a normal life. I live after all in a country where the male finance minister took his male partner to a royal reception and noone objected.

But I am not. Sometimes I also which that I could just come out as a transsexual, get gender reassignment and start a life as a woman. But my inner man protests and tells me that I am definitely "more than a woman".

The search for language

Given that the identity of modern man is so strongly defined by sexual orientation and gender, I have a huge problem, and it is hard to grasp this problem out of lack of words. For a long time I found no words for this condition, and you need language in order to understand yourself.

This is why I was so relieved when I found the term "autogynephilia" on the net: "to love the image of one self as a woman". If there is a scientific term for this condition, it means that I am not alone. And if I am not alone, there may be others I can discuss this with.

So I started this blog. Then I stopped writing, because it dawned on me that this area of research is very much in its infancy, and also very controversial.

Although I recognized much of myself in the descriptions given, there were also parts of the research that did not ring true to me, not so much the descriptions of autogynephiliacs as the explanation -- the underlying narrative. I needed to read more.

Anne Lawrence



In a series of blog posts I will try to sum up some of this reading. I will quote Anne Lawrence liberally. She is an expert in the field. Moreover she is male to female transsexual herself, and a self-confessed "autogynephiliac".

Summary of autogynephilia

Anne Lawrence gives the following summary of what autogyenphilia is, referring to the researcher Ray Blanchard, who coined the term:

"Ray Blanchard proposed that these transsexuals have a paraphilia [i.e. sexual disorder] he called autogynephilia, which is the propensity to be sexually aroused by the thought or image of oneself as female.

"Autogynephilia defines a transsexual typology and provides a theory of transsexual motivation, in that Blanchard proposed that MtF transsexuals are either sexually attracted exclusively to men (homosexual) or are sexually attracted primarily to the thought or image of themselves as female (autogynephilic), and that autogynephilic transsexuals seek sex reassignment to actualize their autogynephilic desires."

Two categories of male to female transsexuals
In another article, she makes the following summary:

"One category of MtF transsexualism includes persons who were overtly feminine as children, who are very feminine as adults, and who are exclusively sexually attracted to men; these individuals are usually referred to as homosexual MtF transsexuals (Cohen-Kettenis & Gooren, 1999). [called nonautogyephiliac by Lawrence].

"The other category of MtF transsexualism includes persons who were not overtly feminine during childhood, who are not remarkably feminine as adults, and who are not exclusively sexually attracted to men, but who may be sexually attracted to women, to women and men, or to neither sex; these individuals are usually referred to as nonhomosexual MtF transsexuals (Cohen-Kettenis & Gooren, 1999).

"Nearly all persons of this second MtF transsexual type have a history of transvestic fetishism or sexual arousal with cross-dressing (Blanchard, 1985; Blanchard, Clemmensen, & Steiner, 1987).[also called autogynephiliacs]"

Four types of autogynephiliacs

Autogynephilia denotes the propensity to be sexually aroused by the thought or image of himself as female. This imagening may take different forms. Blanchard operates with four types of autogynephilia:
  1. Transvestic (fantasy of wearing women's clothing)
  2. Behavioural (fantasy of engaging in typical feminine behaviour, let's say knitting together with women)
  3. Physiologic (fantasy of pregnancy, breast feeding, menstruating)
  4. Anatomic (fantasy of having a woman's body, including partial autogynephilia, where the focus is on a mix of male and female bodyparts, as in -- for instance -- becoming a "she-male".)

More autogynephiliacs take the plunge

The autogynephiliacs are, according to Lawrence, now dominating the group of men who undergo sex reassignment surgery:

"Most of the increase in MtF transsexualism can be accounted for by men who would have been considered atypical—and probably inappropriate—candidates for sex reassignment only a few decades earlier. These men are usually unremarkably masculine in their appearance and behavior, and they typically seek sex reassignment after having lived outwardly successful lives as men, often in male-dominated professions such as engineering or computer science.

"Most have been married to women, and many have fathered children. They invariably have a history of sexual arousal with crossdressing or cross-gender fantasy (Lawrence 2003, 2004). Most MtF transsexuals who undergo sex reassignment in the United States and the United Kingdom now appear to fit this pattern (Green and Young 2001; Lawrence 2005)."

Again: the reason I have found the term so useful, is because I recognize my own life in these descriptions.

That does not mean that I necessarily will accept the theories that lies behind these terms.

In the next blog post I will take a look at why this terminology has been considered so controversial.

[Note of September 2010: Due to the negative connotations following the world "autogynephiliac" I am no longer using it to describe men with feminization fantasies. Instead I use the term crossdreamers.]

[Note of August 2012: I realize now that new reader's who come to this blog and read this post only, may believe that I am a supporter of the autogynephilia theory. This is not the case: Although I know for a fact that crossdreamers (or "autogynephiliacs") exist, the theory used to explain their condition is seriously bad science). Take a look at the following blog post for an in depth discussion of the term and the theory:

The Autogynephilia Theory is in Violation of Basic Research and Health Care Ethics

$
0
0
There can be no doubt that the autogynephilia theory and Ray Blanchard and J. Michael Bailey's research  on transgender people are in violation of fundamental ethical principles of both science and patient care.
Photo: Rawpixel Ltd


By reducing the identity of trans women to being men suffering from a sexual perversion or effeminate gay men trying to seduce straight men, the researchers are basically camouflaging sexist stereotypes  and transphobic beliefs as science.

By doing so they are not only invalidating the identities of transgender people. They are also contributing to the continuous marginalization of trans people by giving trans-phobic bullies arguments that can be used to harass them,

Indeed, this is exactly what we see right now: The autogynephilia theory is nearly exclusively referred to by anti-LGBT activists from the extreme religious right and so-called "trans-exclusionary radical feminists".

Below I have included some paragraphs from documents discussing the ethics of health care and research on humans.

As I see it, the autogynephilia theory is in violation of all these basic principles.


"7. Medical research is subject to ethical standards that promote and ensure respect for all human subjects and protect their health and rights.

8. While the primary purpose of medical research is to generate new knowledge, this goal can never take precedence over the rights and interests of individual research subjects.

9. It is the duty of physicians who are involved in medical research to protect the life, health, dignity, integrity, right to self-determination, privacy, and confidentiality of personal information of research subjects. The responsibility for the protection of research subjects must always rest with the physician or other health care professionals and never with the research subjects, even though they have given consent."


"Sexologists shall respect and uphold the dignity of those receiving their professional services."


"A member respects the client’s personality, experience and dignity. This means sensitivity to individual differences that are based on client’s age, gender identity, sexual orientation, ethnic and cultural origin, language, religion, functional level, education and socioeconomic status. A member is also aware of the limitations that her/his own background might cause in these matters.

A member strives to be unbiased towards the client’s values, way of life and ideology. It is important to identify the impact of one’s own values, emotions and motivations on the client relationships, and one should always pay special attention to using neutral and respectful language when client is contacted via telephone, email or internet."


"A physician shall be dedicated to providing competent medical care with compassion and respect for human dignity and rights.

1. A psychiatrist shall not gratify his or her own needs by exploiting the patient. The psychiatrist shall be ever vigilant about the impact that his or her conduct has upon the boundaries of the doctor–patient relationship, and thus upon the well-being of the patient. These requirements become particularly important because of the essentially private, highly personal, and sometimes intensely emotional nature of the relationship established with the psychiatrist.

2. A psychiatrist should not be a party to any type of policy that excludes, segregates, or demeans the dignity of any patient because of ethnic origin, race, sex, creed, age, socioeconomic status, or sexual orientation."


"3.01 Unfair Discrimination 
In their work-related activities, psychologists do not engage in unfair discrimination based on age, gender, gender identity, race, ethnicity, culture, national origin, religion, sexual orientation, disability, socioeconomic status or any basis proscribed by law.

3.03 Other Harassment 
Psychologists do not knowingly engage in behavior that is harassing or demeaning to persons with whom they interact in their work based on factors such as those persons' age, gender, gender identity, race, ethnicity, culture, national origin, religion, sexual orientation, disability, language or socioeconomic status.

3.04 Avoiding Harm 
Psychologists take reasonable steps to avoid harming their clients/patients, students, supervisers, research participants, organizational clients and others with whom they work, and to minimize harm where it is foreseeable and unavoidable."


"Guideline 1. Psychologists understand that gender is a non‐binary construct that allows for a range of gender identities and that a person’s gender identity may not align with sex assigned at birth. 

Guideline 2. Psychologists understand that gender identity and sexual orientation are distinct but interrelated constructs. 

Guideline 4. Psychologists are aware of how their attitudes about and knowledge of gender identity and gender expression may affect the quality of care they provide to TGNC people and their families. 

Guideline 5. Psychologists recognize how stigma, prejudice, discrimination, and violence affect the health and well‐being of TGNC people."

Hippocrathic Oath (original version 5th century BC, modern version used by many physicians today)

(Modern version, extract:)

"I will respect the hard-won scientific gains of those physicians in whose steps I walk, and gladly share such knowledge as is mine with those who are to follow. I will apply, for the benefit of the sick, all measures which are required, avoiding those twin traps of overtreatment and therapeutic nihilism.

I will remember that there is art to medicine as well as science, and that warmth, sympathy, and understanding may outweigh the surgeon's knife or the chemist's drug. I will not be ashamed to say "I know not," nor will I fail to call in my colleagues when the skills of another are needed for a patient's recovery.

I will respect the privacy of my patients, for their problems are not disclosed to me that the world may know. Most especially must I tread with care in matters of life and death. If it is given me to save a life, all thanks. But it may also be within my power to take a life; this awesome responsibility must be faced with great humbleness and awareness of my own frailty.

Above all, I must not play a God. I will remember that I do not treat a fever chart, a cancerous growth, but a sick human being, whose illness may affect the person's family and economic stability. My responsibility includes these related problems, if I am to care adequately for the sick. I will prevent disease whenever I can, for prevention is preferable to cure.

I will remember that I remain a member of society, with special obligations to all my fellow human beings, those sound of mind and body as well as the infirm."

American Psychoanalytic Association Position Statement on Attempts to Change Sexual Orientation, Gender Identity, or Gender Expression.

“As with any societal prejudice, bias against individuals based on actual or perceived sexual orientation, gender identity or gender expression negatively affects mental health, contributing to an enduring sense of stigma and pervasive self-criticism through the internalization of such prejudice.

Psychoanalytic technique does not encompass purposeful attempts to ‘convert,’ “repair,” change or shift an individual’s sexual orientation, gender identity or gender expression. Such directed efforts are against fundamental principles of psychoanalytic treatment and often result in substantial psychological pain by reinforcing damaging internalized attitudes.”

More on autogynephilia.

(Updated Sept 15 2015, Hippocratic oath added)

Ray Blanchard's Definition of Paraphilia (Perversion)

$
0
0
Blanchard's definition of "paraphilia" (sexual perversion) has absolutely no basis in science, only in his own hang-ups on what constitutes proper sexual behavior.
We believe this couple will pass Blanchard's
perversion test, even the woman is on top and the man
is fully clothed. It is hard to say, given the vagueness of
Blanchard's definition.
Photo: strigaroman


Ray Blanchard is the father of the "autogynephilia" theory, a stigmatizing and transphobic theory that reduces trans women who are attracted to women to sexual perverts ("paraphiliacs").

What people often miss in the transgender debate is the basis for Blanchard understanding of the term paraphilia.

The basis for Blanchard's thinking is the kind of quasi-Darwinian model you find in much of evolutionary psychology, that is: the purpose of sex is reproduction.

This is why he also argues that homosexuality is a disorder (even if he has made desperate attempts at proving that homosexuality can be evolutionary advantageous elsewhere).

Blanchard's (and the gay sexologists James Cantor's) definition of paraphilia therefore ends up like this:

"The term paraphilia denotes any powerful [intense] and persistent sexual interest other than sexual interest in copulatory or precopulatory behavior [genital stimulation or preparatory fondling] with phenotypically normal, consenting adult human partners. "

(Cantor et al., 2009, p. 527, text in brackets refer to the version proposed to the latest edition of the American psychiatric manual, the DSM-5)

To put this in  more everyday terms:

"The term paraphilia covers everything that cannot be classified as a traditional intercourse or traditional foreplay with an adult human partner that looks normal and who agrees to having sex."

Blanchard himself agrees that the definition seems to label everything outside a very narrow range of sexual behaviors as paraphilic. In his presentation, however, he puts up two slides that are supposed to show that this is not the case.

Paraphilic: e.g. 

  • enemas; 
  • feces or urine; 
  • generalized interest in amputees, 
  • paralyzed  persons, 
  • physical deformities; 
  • bondage; 
  • whipping; 
  • cutting; hypoxia, 
  • sneezing or smoking persons, 
  • obscene telephone calls.


Not paraphilic: e.g.

  • cunnilingus, 
  • fellatio, 
  • anal penetration with the finger, penis, or dildo; 
  • anilingus, 
  • intracrural intercourse; 
  • cross masturbation; 
  • kissing; 
  • and fondling.


And this is where he reveals that his science is nothing but an old man's desperate attempt at forcing his own view of what is "normal" upon a nature that does not care for these kinds of neurotic classification schemes.

There is actually no underpinning logic to what Blanchard considers paraphilic or not paraphilic, only his own personal prejudices as what should be considered kosher at this particular point in history.

This isn't science. This is sexist stereotypes camouflaged as science. This is the story about the blind leading the seeing. This is the story about the sexually obsessed telling healthy people that they are perverts. This is the story about sexology becoming a weapon of oppression. And they tell me I am the mentally ill one...


Relevant blog posts



Literature

POSTSCRIPT ON THE CELESTIAL EMPORIUM

Blanchard's definition reminds me a bit about Jorge Luis Borges'"Celestial Emporium of Benevolent Knowledge". Borges' point was that our ways of classifying the world around us is often based on completely arbitrary concepts grown out of a particular culture. His quote from an imaginary ancient Chinese encyclopaedia serves to illustrate this.

The encyclopaedia divides animals into:
  • those that belong to the Emperor,
  • embalmed ones,
  • those that are trained,
  • suckling pigs,
  • mermaids,
  • fabulous ones,
  • stray dogs,
  • those included in the present classification,
  • those that tremble as if they were mad,
  • innumerable ones,
  • those drawn with a very fine camelhair brush,
  • others,
  • those that have just broken a flower vase,
  • those that from a long way off look like flies.
Blanchard' lists of parahilic and non-paraphilic sexual desires and practices are equally absurd.

How to Stop Transphobic Bullies

$
0
0
This is a sidebar to the post What Drives Transphobia over at crossdreamers.com.

A blogger over at tumblr asked me:
What can you do to stop transphobic
bullies? (Illustration photo: Photodisc)

What is the best way to teach others that alienating a transgender person is wrong? How should I, even as just one person...how can I make a difference?

I answered: 

Humanize transgender people!

Make the others see and feel that they are real people, just like them. This may require some kind of contextualizing: “How would you feel if you were harassed for identifying with your own assigned gender?”

If you know the person, it might help to bring up areas where they have been harassed for other things, just to remind them of how it feels to be excluded.

These kinds of arguments won’t work with the truly militant transphobes, but then again, it is not your job to convince everyone.

You can reduce the damage they do in your community, though. If one of the extremists brings up anti-trans propaganda, you may, in a calm and constructive manner, present some reasonable facts. The extremist won’t be convinced, but the other listeners may.

This requires that you have facts at hand, of course, so you would have to read up on the latest research and discussions. Much of this is available online. To give you one example:

Extremist: “Trans women are perverted men who want to molest women in public bathrooms.”

You: “I have heard of no cases where trans persons have harassed trans women in a public bath room. I am not saying that this cannot happen, as there are bad seeds among all groups of people, but if it ever does happen, it is extremely rare. Trans people, like other people, go to the bath room to relieve themselves.

“I have heard of many instances of straight non-transgender men harassing women in such places, however, not to speak of all the trans women who have been sexually assaulted and beaten up in mens’ bathrooms. Remember also that you by banning trans women from women’s bathrooms, will force trans men to use women’s bath rooms. Is that truly what you want?”

The point is to make everyone see how unreasonable they are.

Remember that transphobes will argue that anything bad a trans person does can be explained by them being transgender. Anything bad a non-transgender person does will be explained by special circumstances, unique to that person,. That is: Unless they belong to some other marginalized group. African-American criminals are criminals because they are black. White, rich, criminals are criminals because they are unfortunate, mad, had a bad childhood or whatever.

It helps to unmask the hypocrisy in arguing this way.

Please add comments to this post: What Drives Transphobia?

The SAGE Encyclopedia of LGBTQ Studies on Autogynephilia

$
0
0
This is what the SAGE Encyclopedia of LGBTQ Studies has to say about autogynephilia:

'The term autogynephilia was first used in 1989 by Ray Blanchard, a sexologist, to describe a purported class of transgender women.  Classifications of transgender women prior to this time tended to divide this group into those who were sexually and romantically interested in men as “homosexual transsexuals” and those who were sexually and romantically interested in women were classified as “heterosexual fetishistic transvestites.”   
Critiques of these classifications noted that the “homosexual” and “heterosexual labels were applied incorrectly, failing to recognize the gender identities of trans women themselves.   
These classifications also reflected mainstream stigma around transgender identity as they resigned many transgender women to little more than sexual fetishists.  The autogynephilia label only intensified this view of some transgender women as sexual fetishists.   
The theory of autogynephilia asserted that many of the trans women classified into the “heterosexual fetishistic transvestites” category were primarily attracted not to women but to the idea of themselves as women.  In this way, autogynephilia was proposed as a type of primary sexual-identity category for transgender women.   
Subsequent research has found little empirical basis for such a classification, and many researchers have criticized the classification as transphobic.  
One particular critique of this classification system concerns its failure to recognize the way in which all sexual attraction depends on one’s own gender identity.  For example, a critical component of both homosexual and heterosexual attraction among many cisgender men involves an erotic charge around one’s own manliness or manhood.   
To assume that such attachments to (and sexual desire motivated through) one’s own gender identity and expression, in relation to another’s, exists only among transgender women, is misguided.   
Despite a relative lack of empirical support for the diagnoses of autogynephilia among transgender women, some segments of the radical feminist community endorse this diagnostic category in their own writing as well. ( … )  
The most outspoken critiques of the theory of autogynephilia have emerged from self-identified transfeminist academics (e.g. Julia Serano and Talia Mae Bettcher), who have highlighted not only the lack of empirical support for these theories but also the underlying biases and assumption revealed in the very foundations of the theory itself.'

Is it true that 1/3 of non-transgender people fantasize about being the other sex?

$
0
0
In my article "More than one third of non-transgender people have had crossgender dreams and fantasies" I have referred to research done by Justin Lehmiller, Daphna Joel and Roi Jacobson that imply that as many as 35-39 percent of cisgender (i.e. non-transgender) people have dreamed about being the other gender. 

Do these studies prove that more than one third of cisgender people have crossdreamed? Can we trust these numbers?



Lehmiller's study

Let us take a look at Lehmiller's book, Tell Me What You Want: The Science of Sexual Desire and How It Can Help You Improve Your Sex Life, first.

Since the respondents were recruited via social media and some types of people may be more likely to respond to such questionnaires than others, we cannot be sure that the numbers are representative of the population as a whole.

For instance, he says that:
Religious folks and Republicans were somewhat underrepresented; however, many religious and political conservatives still ended up in my sample.
Democrats were more likely to have cross-gender fantasies than Republicans, but as Lehmiller points out, it is not easy to ascertain what causes what:
Do people with gender-bending interests gravitate toward political parties that are likely to be more accepting of them, or does being part of a political party that espouses equality allow people to acknowledge gender-variant interests? This is another case where I suspect there's a bit of both going on.
It could also be that some conservatives find crossdreaming fantasies more stigmatizing than other sexual fantasies.

The current backlash against trans people in American conservative circles tell me that we are facing a deep cultural anxiety linked to traditional gender roles, which is especially linked to the hypermasculine fear of emasculation and feminization.

So maybe the right-wingers are more likely to lie about crossdreaming fantasies, to themselves and to the researchers.

However, according to Lehmiller American Republicans willingly admit to fantasies about infidelity, swinging, orgies, exhibitionism, voyeurism and fetishism, so it is not as if Conservatives do not have imaginative sex fantasies.

So I might be wrong about my hypermasculinity theory. Conservatives are also more likely to dream about cuckolding than Democrats, which is another form of emasculation. Moreover, I have been in touch with a lot of crossdreamers from all over the world while writing the Crossdreamer blog and moderating the Crossdream Life forum, and I have found crossdreamers and transgender people from all over the political spectrum.

In other words: It could be that doubt that the political bias found in the selection has some effect on the the percentage of respondents reporting crossdreaming fantasies, but I doubt this effect is big.

The Israeli study

The Israeli researchers also recruited respondents by using social media.
Participants were recruited to complete an Internet questionnaire with special effort to recruit participants from sexual minority groups (“minority” in terms of the proportion in the population). No means were taken to guarantee random sampling of the population. Invitations were sent to several groups and organizations that concentrate on LGBT issues and posted on relevant online forums. Invitations were also posted on the Facebook profiles of the researchers.
The fact that the researchers targeted LGBT groups and organizations may partly explain the difference between their results and the ones of Lehmiller. The fact that 76 percent of the female respondents considered themselves feminists, does  indicate a "liberal" bias.

Even if the numbers presented in the study of cisgender gender and sexualities mainly refers  the cisgender part of their sample. LGBT-friendly cis people are probably more likely to answer the call for a response to such a survey.

Again: I am not sure if this has had a significant impact on the final result. I suspect  that liberal oriented people will be more open and honest about such issues, but given that anonymity is ensured, I could be wrong.

But let us for a moment take this doubt seriously. Let us say that right wing respondents are less likely to be crossdreaming (for whatever reason). Even if we cut the percentage of cisgender people who have crossdreamed in half, we still have close to 20  percent of the cisgender population reporting crossdreaming. That is a lot, and far too many to describe such fantasies as the sign of some kind of mental illness.

Crossdreaming, in the sense of imagining your self as being or behaving like another gender,  is quite normal among non-transgender people.

Back to the main blog post!

LITTERATURE

Justin Lehmiller: Tell Me What You Want: The Science of Sexual Desire and How It Can Help You Improve Your Sex Life, New York 2018.

Daphna Joel, Ricardo Tarrasch, Zohar Berman, Maya Mukamel & Effi Ziv (2014) "Queering gender: studying gender identity in ‘normative’ individuals," Psychology & Sexuality, 5:4, 291-321, DOI: 10.1080/19419899.2013.830640

Roi Jacobson and Daphna Joel: "An Exploration of the Relations Between Self‐Reported Gender Identity and Sexual Orientation in an Online Sample of Cisgender Individuals," Archives of Sexual Behavior 2018, Vol. 47, Issue 8, 2407–2426 DOI: 10.1007/s10508-018-1239-y

Roi Jacobson & Daphna Joel: "Self-Reported Gender Identity and Sexuality in an Online Sample of Cisgender, Transgender, and Gender-Diverse Individuals: An Exploratory Study," The Journal of Sex Research, 2018, DOI: 10.1080/00224499.2018.1523998

Female to Male Crossdreaming in Garden of Desires

$
0
0
Emily Dubberley's collection of female sexual fantasies contains several crossdreamer fantasies, where the respondents dream of being a man, playing the role of a man and/or having a penis.

Here are few relevant excerpts from the book. Note that these texts contain sexually explicit language.

This is a sidebar to the Crossdreamer.com article On women who have sexual fantasies about being men.



Anon, 25 years old:

I guess my favourite fantasy could be described as a D/s (domination and submission) gagging/blow job scene, but that doesn’t really capture it. It involves two male-bodied male-identified people. In my head, I can be either participant, most often my perspective switches throughout the scene. It involves a ring gag and face-fucking (leading up to anal penetration), the gentleness/roughness can change within the scene or stay the same. The dominant person drags the tip of their cock over the other’s face. This is important. It conveys a very difficult emotion that includes ownership, gentleness, a feeling of privilege, love and affection on both persons’ parts.
Jess, 30, bisexual:
‘I really like thinking about myself as male during sex, probably in part because of the way my thinking about male sexuality is shaped by society (I imagine “male sexuality” as involving being in control, subverting norms by being receptive, more likely to orgasm). I’ve told my partner about my fantasies, although largely a general statement of thinking of myself as male. I don’t like to share particulars, because I worry he would think I was mentally cheating. He’s been pretty great about it! The language he uses during sex has changed a little bit, and instead of just using a strap-on to fuck him, we’ve also done some stuff where I wear a strap-on during PIV sex. Strap-on sex in general is one of his major fantasies, and it’s been fantastic.
Anon, cis, queer, 25, feminist 
‘My most recent fantasy is that I am a bear male and my (cis male partner) is my fag. I enjoy spooning my cis male partner whilst I masturbate him, feelings of his penis is my penis etc.’
Anon, straight, switch, college student, cisfemale
‘I’ve frequently imagined myself as male. Having a penis was a very regular part of my early fantasies. In addition to having sex with my boyfriend, my main dominant fantasy involves pegging him, mostly going back to that early desire and fantasy of having a penis.
Lea, 31, bi but in a long-term heterosexual relationship,
‘The first fantasy I remember I was recreating the storyline of a soft core porn film I’d seen on TV about a guy who sleeps his way to good grades, then with all sorts of women around a fancy castle. I was a man in that fantasy, and I am in fact a man in my fantasies more often than not (but I identify as female). I have had two recurring ones recently: one based on a comic book strip I read where as a powerful businessman I get a woman to go down on me in a swanky office in exchange for money; the other is inspired by a scene in True Blood – as a male vampire, I am penetrating a woman from behind as her hands are tied to the ceiling; as I ejaculate I bite down on her neck and suck her blood.’
Anna, 38
When I’m feeling really close to my partner during sex, I sometimes take this further. I love the idea of growing a cock to penetrate him with, and him growing a pussy so we can fuck and be connected as man and woman all at once, his cock in me as mine is in him. I think it comes from an idea I heard about Plato’s ‘split aparts’ – that couples were originally individuals who were split into two parts by lightening after angering the gods.
Anon, 48, bi-poly
During sex I fantasise that I’ve got a penis (as I imagine it’s more sensitive than a clitoris as it’s more accessible on all sides). I enjoy gender-bending stuff in others as well as myself. It helps me orgasm when I have trouble, whether masturbating or having sex. I think my experiences with witnessing how sensitive a man’s penis is triggered it. Also, my bi-ness helps me feel fine about imagining having sex with a woman or her doing oral sex on my penis, even though I wouldn’t really want a penis at other times. After I shared this fantasy with my husband, although hetero, he’s found that he likes to imagine I have a penis at times when he’s sexually excited too, so we sometimes pretend his penis is mine while I jack him off while he’s on my chest or I’m sitting on him.

Go back to the main article:  On women who have sexual fantasies about being men.

Dubberley, Emily. Garden of Desires (Black Lace) . Ebury Publishing.

Can We Trust Science in the Transgender Debate?

$
0
0

Bigoted science has caused tremendous suffering, here represented with a still form the movie One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest. But does this mean that all science is bad?

In my article on the sexologist Ray Blanchard and his embrace of transphobic TERFs and white supremacists, I have made the argument that science, throughout history, has been used by racists, misogynists, homophobes and transphobes to  harass and invalidate marginalized groups. Does this mean that we cannot trust science?

The answer to this question is both yes and no. The fact that something is written in a science paper published in a peer reviewed journal does not make its message true. Ray Blanchard has presented his transphobic theories in such journals.

But then again most recent peer reviewed papers on this topic criticizes his model, and these days the great majority of papers addressing gender variance and gender incongruence are affirming the identities of trans people. Most of these researchers want to help.

Science is a process

Here's the problem: Too many people have a too simplistic understanding of the scientific process. They do not grasp that it is a process. It is a process where ideas and findings are presented and discussed in the scientific community, and where the goal is that this collective process shall end up in some kind of consensus or – at least – clarify what the disagreements are all about.

So, over time, the idea is this community may end up with a clearer understanding of what is really going on.  This means that one single peer review article says something is true, does not prove that it is so. However, if a large number of studies, performed by different scientists at different locations, end up with similar results, the chances are that they are on to something.

Why science goes astray

But (there is always a "but", isn't there?) even such processes may fail, and for a variety of reasons:

1. Scientists may be trapped in disciplinary and cultural silos, where the members scratch each others backs and push out those who do not agree with their understanding of what's right and proper science. Ray Blanchard often  publishes his papers in Archives of Sexual Behavior, a journal controlled by his friends and co-believers.

When the Freudian paradigm dominated psychiatry, the idea that gay and trans people could be "cured" by conditioning became popular. Among the methods used were electroconvulsive "therapy", electrodes implanted in the brain, lobotomies and more. Today we know that a sexual orientation or a gender identity cannot be cured.

2. Scientists are human beings, and as human beings they often share the prejudices of the society surrounding them. This means that they are more likely to design research projects that aim at confirming their own prejudices than falsifying them. They are often likely to avoid research questions that can lead to results that undermine these beliefs. 

3. Such scientists are also less likely to listen to other types of expertise, as – for instance – knowledgeable representatives of the groups they are studying (as in people from the civil rights movement, gay activists or transgender thinkers.) Indeed, the far too common idea that "science tells the truth, and all others are prejudiced idiots" will often reinforce this tendency. When this is the case it rarely matters if these outsiders are also trained as scientists.

Thomas Kuhn.

4. Then there is the question of paradigm shifts, as originally described by the American physicist and philosopher Thomas Kuhn. This is when the complete world view underpinning the research done breaks down, as there are simply too many observations that do not live up to the expected predictions. A paradigm shift takes time, as the scientists who have invested their lives in the old framework will do their best top stop the new one from taking over. 

Ray Blanchard (to give one obvious example) is still stuck in a paradigm of sexuality and gender developed in the 19th century. He is therefore incapable of adapting to the current paradigm, which sees sexuality and gender as continuums created by a complex interplay between genes, epigenetics, hormones, life history and culture.

Yes, culture does influence science

It is actually true, as some homophobic and transphobic activists argue, that scientists may be influenced by general cultural shifts and what people outside the scientific community may say. 

In sexology, to give one obvious example, the fight for gay and trans rights has contributed to a shift towards a more openminded respect for diversity. Neither homosexuality or trans identities are no longer considered mental illnesses. 

But this is not because the researchers are no longer  following the accepted practices of good research. Rather, questions raised outside science have made these researchers ask different research questions; they interpret the data in a more critical way and they may even question the belief systems of the previous generations of researchers. 

That is a good thing. This is exactly the kind of interaction that brings science forward. 

What all of this means is that when we use science in a political and cultural debate, we need to go deeper than some random search on Google, digging up a paper that confirms our own predictions. We need to do a broader sweep of the science landscape, including different disciplines and diverse approaches.

Read: Science and Transphobia: Ray Blanchard is Now Assisting White Supremacists. Why?

The word "paraphilia" does indeed mean "sexual perversion". Don't let the transphobes whitewash their transphobia.

$
0
0


In some of the online "autogynephilia" debates I come across Blanchard-supporters who tell me that "paraphilia" is a benign term that simply means "unusual". The implicit message is that calling a trans woman "paraphilic" cannot be stigmatizing, as it is an innocent descriptive term. They are wrong.

For those who are unfamiliar with these terms: "autogynephilia" is a term made up by Ray Blanchard, a transphobilc psychologist, who have spent much of his time helping anti-trans activists, arguing that trans women who are attracted to women are suffering from a "paraphilia".

Many of his supporters, some of whom are trans folks who have internalized the transphobia of their society, try desperately to picture him in a more positive view, to the point where they even try to turn into a friend of trans people.

He is not, as I have documented in the article Science and Transphobia: Ray Blanchard is Now Assisting White Supremacists. Why?

Blanchard has never presented "autogynephilia" as anything else but a sexual perversion. And given that his "autogynephilia" is a "paraphilia", his message is, and has always been that gynephilic and bisexual trans women are sexual perverts. It cannot get much more stigmatizing than that.

Here's what he said in an interview with the conservative site National Review:

Kearns: I’m really interested in your work on “paraphilia.” What is the difference between “paraphilia” and, say, a “disorder” or an even older term perhaps, a “perversion”?

Blanchard: Yeah sure, “perversion” was an older label for what’s now called paraphilia. Correct.

Kearns: And is the only difference a linguistic one where the morally loaded connotations of the word are removed? Or is there a substantive difference?

Blanchard: I don’t think there is any substantive difference. I mean the word “pervert” had become part of the lay vocabulary and was routinely used as an insult or as a derogatory comment whether seriously or in jest. Everybody knew the word pervert, had a vague idea of what it meant, and knew that it was something bad. So, the word paraphilia was substituted because it had a nice medical sound to it, and it had not and still has not entered the popular vocabulary as an insult.

And, for once, Blanchard is right. Paraphilia is a new term for sexual perversion, popularized by John Money, who wanted to avoid the stigma attached to the term "perversion". In the medical community, however, the connotations remained the same.

The medical establishment is, step by step, leaving this kind of invalidation behind. The international manual of health, The ICD-11, has simply removed any reference to "fetishistic transvestism" in its recent edition. The American DSM-5 is somewhat schizophrenic on the matter, as it has included "autogynephilia" as a "paraphilia", while it at the same time says that such feels can be a sign of gender dysphoria and as such not a mental illness. This is because the chapter on paraphilias was controlled by Blanchard and the chapter on gender dysphoria by a new generation of researchers.

See also: Blanchard and the DSM-V, redefining paraphilia
Bibliography on paraphilias and the DSM-5
What the DSM-5 says about terms like transgender, transsexual and gender dysphoria

Science and Transphobia: Ray Blanchard is Now Assisting White Supremacists. Why?

The photo: You noticed, didn't you? This is not a photo of Ray Blanchard, but of the Architect in the transgender Wachowski-sisters' Matrix movies. The similarity is by no means accidental. In the movies the Architect created the digital simulation that keeps people in bondage, while Ray Blanchard has developed a narrative that forces trans people to live by the rules of a transphobic society.


What Judith Butler Said about TERFs

$
0
0
Here are the censored paragraphs from Guardian's interview with feminist philosopher Judith Butler:

Gleeson: “It seems that some within feminist movements are becoming sympathetic to these far-right campaigns. This year's furore around Wi Spa in Los Angeles saw an online outrage by transphobes followed by bloody protests organised by the Proud Boys. Can we expect this alliance to continue?”

Butler:“It is very appalling and sometimes quite frightening to see how trans-exclusionary feminists have allied with rightwing attacks on gender. The anti-gender ideology movement is not opposing a specific account of gender, but seeking to eradicate "gender" as a concept or discourse, a field of study, an approach to social power.

Sometimes they claim that if “sex” alone has scientific standing, but other times they appeal to divine mandates for masculine domination and difference. They don't seem to mind contradicting themselves.

The Terfs (trans exclusionary radical feminists) and the so-called gender critical writers have also rejected the important work in feminist philosophy of science showing how culture and nature interact (such as Karen Barad, Donna Haraway, EM Hammonds or Anne Fausto-Sterling) in favor of a regressive and spurious form of biological essentialism. So they will not be part of the coalition that seeks to fight the anti-gender movement.

The anti-gender ideology is one of the dominant strains of fascism in our times. So the Terfs will not be part of the contemporary struggle against fascism, one that requires a coalition guided by struggles against racism, nationalism, xenophobia and carceral violence, one that is mindful of the high rates of femicide throughout the world, which include high rates of attacks on trans and gender queer people.

The anti-gender movement circulates a spectre of "gender" as a force of destruction, but they never actually read any works in gender studies. Quick and fearful conclusions take the place of considered judgments. Yes, some work on gender is difficult and not everyone can read it, so we have to do better in reaching a broader public.

As important as it is, however, to make complex concepts available to a popular audience, it is equally important to encourage intellectual inquiry as part of public life. Unfortunately we are living in anti-intellectual times, and neo-fascism is becoming more normalized.”

All you need to know about autogynephilia

$
0
0


Some (relatively) easy to read articles on the autogynephilia theory of Ray Blanchard.

The autogynephilia theory has been debunked by both science and the lived lives of real transgender people.  However, since this "theory" fits well with the prejudices of transphobes and homophobes world wide, it is still referred to, in the dark backwaters of social media, and increasingly also elsewhere.

The autogynephilia theory – which argues that trans women who love women are straight men who are in love with their inner female – might easily confirm the internalized homophobia and transphobia of transgender people. Because of this I have had to spend a lot of time debating and deconstructing the theory.

Blanchard's theory is really traditional transphobia masquerading as science. However, since it is presented as science, this give the model much more power than it deserves. It is really bad science.

It is important to note that Blanchard is in no way a disinterested observer of gender identity. He is actively helping TERFs (trans-exclusionary radical feminists) and right wing extremists by writing for the web sites and taking part in their podcasts and videos. This tells us that his real motives are based on bigotry and not a desire to help trans and queer people.

If you, for some reason, find "autogynephilia" or "AGP" mentioned in the transgender debate, here's what you need to know about this and similar beliefs:

The autogynephilia theory explained and dissected

On using "autogynephilia" as a transphobic tool of oppression and invalidation:


The transgender relevant terms used by the DSM-5-TR, the revised version of the American psychiatric manual

$
0
0
The DSM-5 is published by the Americal Psychiatric Association and includes all kinds of diagnoses relevant to mental health. 

Being transgender is no longer considered a mental illness, but the manual does contain a chapter of gender dysphoria, which is a possible effect of gender incongruence (a mismatch between someone's assigned gender and their experienced gender.) 

The manual also have an interesting introductory chapter, which presents the gender relevant language of American psychiatry right now.

I am taking the liberty of republishing the revised 2022 introduction to the chapter on gender dysphoria here, as it can serve as useful reminder in a time where all kinds of transphobic activists claim that "science" is on their side.

I have reformatted the text to increase legibility. The headlines are mine.

Note that I do not necessarily agree with the use of all of these terms ("disorders of sex development" should have been binned in the same way as "gender identity disorder"), but all in all I think the APA has managed to develop a terminology that encompasses gender variance in both a scientific and socially respectful manner.

Note also that:

  • The term “desired gender” is now “experienced gender." 
  • The term “cross-sex medical procedure” is now “gender-affirming medical procedure." 
  • The term “natal male”/“natal female” is now “individual assigned male/female at birth.”
Finally: The American Psychiatric Association should publish the whole volume for free online, in the spirit of open science and open access. Asking for 170 US$ for a text that has so many ramifications for so many people represents a serious democratic problem.

Here's the introduction to the DSM-5-TR chapter on gender dysphoria.


Gender dysphoria

In this chapter, there is one overarching diagnosis of gender dysphoria, with separate developmentally appropriate criteria sets for children and for adolescents and adults. 

Biological sex

The area of sex and gender is highly controversial and has led to a proliferation of terms whose meanings vary over time and within and between disciplines. An additional source of confusion is that in English “sex” connotes both male/female and sexuality.

This chapter employs constructs and terms as they are widely used by clinicians from various disciplines with specialization in treating gender dysphoria. 

In this chapter, sex and sexual refer to the biological indicators of male and female (understood in the context of reproductive capacity), such as in sex chromosomes, gonads, sex hormones, and nonambiguous internal and external genitalia. 

Intersex 

Disorders of sex development or differences of sex development (DSDs) included the historical terms hermaphroditism and pseudohermaphroditism. 

DSDs include somatic intersex conditions such as congenital development of ambiguous genitalia (e.g., clitoromegaly, micropenis), congenital disjunction of internal and external sex anatomy (e.g., complete androgen insensitivity syndrome), incomplete development of sex anatomy (e.g., gonadal agenesis), sex chromosome anomalies (e.g., Turner syndrome; Klinefelter syndrome), or disorders of gonadal development (e.g., ovotestes).

Gender

Gender is used to denote the public, sociocultural (and usually legally recognized) lived role as boy or girl, man or woman, or other gender. Biological factors are seen as contributing, in interaction with social and psychological factors, to gender development. 

Gender assignment refers to the assignment as male or female. This occurs usually at birth based on phenotypic sex and, thereby, yields the birth-assigned gender, historically referred to as “biological sex” or, more recently, “natal gender.” Birth-assigned sex is often used interchangeably with birth-assigned gender. 

The terms assigned sex and assigned gender encompass birth-assigned sex/gender but also include gender/sex assignments and reassignments made after birth but during infancy or early childhood, usually in the case of intersex conditions. 

Gender-atypical refers to somatic features or behaviors that are not typical (in a statistical sense) of individuals with the same assigned gender in a given society and historical era; gender-nonconforming, gender variant, and gender diverse are alternative nondiagnostic terms. Gender reassignment denotes an official (and sometimes legal) change of gender. 

Gender-affirming treatments are medical procedures (hormones or surgeries or both) that aim to align an individual’s physical characteristics with their experienced gender. 

Gender identity is a category of social identity and refers to an individual’s identification as male, female, some category in between (i.e., gender fluid), or a category other than male or female (i.e., gender neutral). There has been a proliferation of gender identities in recent years. 

Gender dysphoria

Gender dysphoria as a general descriptive term refers to the distress that may accompany the incongruence between one’s experienced or expressed gender and one’s assigned gender. 

However, it is more specifically defined when used as a diagnostic category. It does not refer to distress related to stigma, a distinct although possibly co-occurring source of distress. 

Transgender

Transgender refers to the broad spectrum of individuals whose gender identity is different from their birth-assigned gender. Cisgender describes individuals whose gender expression is congruent with their birth-assigned gender (also nontransgender). 

Transsexual, a historic term, denotes an individual who seeks, is undergoing, or has undergone a social transition from male to female or female to male, which in many, but not all, cases also involves a somatic transition by gender-affirming hormone treatment and genital, breast, or other genderaffirming surgery (historically referred to as sex reassignment surgery).

Although not all individuals will experience distress from incongruence, many are distressed if the desired physical interventions using hormones and/or surgery are not available. The current term is more descriptive than the previous DSM-IV term gender identity disorder and focuses on dysphoria as the clinical problem, not identity per se.

See also: 

More selected discussions from the Crossdream Life forum on gender variance and trans issues

$
0
0

In this post we are sharing some more discussions of general interest, for you to read and the search engines to find.

Thanks to Terrie for making this list.

SELECTED DISCUSSIONS ON GENDER, TRANS AND QUEER ISSUES

Porn is not addictive, Psychology Today argues.
porn-is-not-addictive-psychology-today-argues-t247.html

Are men who are attracted to trans women with penises gay?
are-men-who-are-attracted-to-trans-wome ... i-t14.html

A review of Felix' new ebook on crossdreaming and the art of transgender erotica
a-review-of-felix-new-ebook-on-crossdre ... -t360.html

"How Blanchard nearly killed me"
how-blanchard-nearly-killed-me-t843.html

Anne Lawrence rises from the dead
anne-lawrence-rises-from-the-dead-t913.html


Does Blanchard have any professional scientific ethics?
does-blanchard-have-any-professional-sc ... -t932.html

Upcoming Japanese CROSS DREAMER Movie!
upcoming-japanese-cross-dreamer-movie-t467.html

Blanchard Recent Interview Online
blanchard-recent-interview-online-t1447.html

Fairly in-depth video rebuttal of the AGP theory by Contrapoints
fairly-in-depth-video-rebuttal-of-the-a ... t1505.html

The Jurassic Clarke: Blanchard and Bailey still attacking trans women--now on 21st Century hate-blogs
the-jurassic-clarke-blanchard-and-baile ... tml#p14041

The arguments of truscum and transmedicalists
the-arguments-of-truscum-and-transmedic ... t1563.html

The psychological origins and causes of erotic crossdressing (+ why transvestite is a dumb term!)
the-psychological-origins-and-causes-of ... t1562.html

"Why do so many trans women eroticize femininity or have transformation fetishes?" Let's discuss.
why-do-so-many-trans-women-eroticize-fe ... html#p1071

Another 'AGPer' Attacks Trans Women
another-agper-attacks-trans-women-t1668.html

Anne Lawrence Men Trapped in Men's Body's Book She has a valid point
anne-lawrence-men-trapped-in-men-s-body ... t1972.html

Conversion therapy is really bad for trans people
conversion-therapy-is-really-bad-for-tr ... tml#p24152

The autogynephilia theory does not explain crossdreaming
the-autogynephilia-theory-does-not-expl ... t2698.html

Great article on the autogynephilia theory by Julia Serano
great-article-on-the-autogynephilia-the ... t2888.html

Daniel Radcliffe vs JK Rowling
daniel-radcliffe-vs-jk-rowling-t3029.html

What cracked your egg?
what-cracked-your-egg-t2620.html

Judith Butler on "gender ideology"
judith-butler-on-gender-ideology-t2091.html

Ray Blanchard cannot help himself
ray-blanchard-cannot-help-himself-t3426.html

Why do “forced feminization” narratives resonate with closeted trans folks?
why-do-forced-feminization-narratives-r ... 7-s10.html

On Ray Blanchard's embrace of TERFs and white supremacists and what it means for the role of science
on-ray-blanchard-s-embrace-of-terfs-and ... t3533.html

How would you explain crossdressing arousal to someone in under 1 min. without AGP/'transvestic fetishism' explanation?
how-would-you-explain-crossdressing-aro ... t3640.html

Gender Dysphoria Isn’t What You Think…
gender-dysphoria-isn-t-what-you-think-t3620.html

‘Loki’: Inside the Decision to Have Him ‘Fall In Love With XXXXXXXX’
loki-inside-the-decision-to-have-him-fa ... t3624.html

Kourtney Kardashian comes out as "autogynephilic"
kourtney-kardashian-comes-out-as-autogy ... t3319.html

Racist and transphobic jokes are never “just joking”
racist-and-transphobic-jokes-are-never- ... t3840.html

A Marxist Critique of TERFs (Now Updated with a Tory Critique!)
a-marxist-critique-of-terfs-now-updated ... t3728.html

Statistical Character Survey
statistical-character-survey-t2892.html

Anti-trans group Women’s Human Rights Campaign believes “sissy hypno porn” is hypnotising people into being trans
anti-trans-group-women-s-human-rights-c ... t3959.html

Voice Changers: ReSpeecher
voice-changers-respeecher-t3566.html

What the word "gender" really means
what-the-word-gender-really-means-t4075.html

How and why are we erasing Trans Elders?
how-and-why-are-we-erasing-trans-elders-t4086.html

Is it OK for a cis woman to refuse treatment from a transgender gynecologist?
is-it-ok-for-a-cis-woman-to-refuse-trea ... t4168.html

A TERF stategy primer
a-terf-stategy-primer-t3280.html

On the Sexual Dimorphism of the Brain
on-the-sexual-dimorphism-of-the-brain-t4179.html

ROGD and Social Contagion is bullshit
rogd-and-social-contagion-is-bullshit-t4192-s20.html

"Per Performativity", a very interesting video review of "Boku Girl" by "Pause and Select"
per-performativity-a-very-interesting-v ... html#p1038

Crossdreamer flag/ Just out of Curiosity
crossdreamer-flag-just-out-of-curiosity-t1785.html

The everyday heroism of saying Yes to the Must
the-everyday-heroism-of-saying-yes-to-t ... t2564.html

Rest in Peace: Prince, and yes, he was -- in some sense -- part of our family
rest-in-peace-prince-and-yes-he-was-in- ... .html#p392

What Artbreeder can tell us about gender
artbreeder-t2755-s10.html

How cool is Billy Porter?
how-cool-is-billy-porter-t2489.html

Is it offensive to make stories about people being magically transformed into another gender?
is-it-offensive-to-make-stories-about-p ... t3004.html

Maybe I have misunderstood my female side. About a TG comic.
maybe-i-have-misunderstood-my-female-si ... 0-s10.html

Crossdreaming and Shakspeare
crossdreaming-and-shakspeare-t2953.html

Gender Transformation in Literature - The Land of Oz
gender-transformation-in-literature-the ... .html#p461

Mimicry: Girlfag in a nutshell
mimicry-girlfag-in-a-nutshell-t1899.html

Crossdreamy cartoons
cartoons-t2992.html

Gender bending, queer and nonbinary music videos and performances
gender-bending-queer-and-nonbinary-musi ... t3447.html

Movies with bad representations of trans women
movies-with-bad-representations-of-tran ... t3887.html

A kind of Matrix reset
a-kind-of-matrix-reset-t3760.html

“Have you even tried to wear a dress?”
have-you-even-tried-to-wear-a-dress-t4017.html

Transgender meme thread
transgender-meme-thread-t4081.html

Challenge: Crossdreamer moments in movies and TV episodes
challenge-crossdreamer-moments-in-movie ... t1587.html

The Crossdreamer Newsletter for transgender content

$
0
0

The Crossdreamer blog and the Transgender World site have a common newsletter which can be found over at Substack.

All the separate newsletters are published over at Substack, and the Crossdreamer Newsletter site therefore serves as a separate gateway into our transgender and nonbinary content.

This is a slow tempo news-service, as we do not send out a email newsletter more than some 10 times a year. The point is to present you only with the most important content from our sites.

We include content related to gender variance, transgender and nonbinary issues and on people's understanding of gender.

You can sign up for the newsletter here! It is free.

If low frequency is not what you are looking for, we also have daily updated channels for transgender news. You can follow them here:


Viewing all 24 articles
Browse latest View live